Chiu, S., Larson, R. (2009). Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(1), 1-26.

Samuel S. Chiu; Richard C. Larson. "Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random". Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3, 1, 2009, 1-26.

Chiu, S., Larson, R. (2009). 'Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random', Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(1), pp. 1-26.

Chiu, S., Larson, R. Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2009; 3(1): 1-26.

Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited: More Lessons about that Ambiguous Word, Random

^{1}Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA

^{2}Engineering Systems Division and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, E40-233, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

Abstract

The Bertrand paradox question is: “Consider a unit-radius circle for which the length of a side of an inscribed equilateral triangle equals 3 . Determine the probability that the length of a ‘random’ chord of a unit-radius circle has length greater than 3 .” Bertrand derived three different ‘correct’ answers, the correctness depending on interpretation of the word, random. Here we employ geometric and probability arguments to extend Bertrand’s analysis in two ways: (1) for his three classic examples, we derive the probability distributions of the chord lengths; and (2) we also derive the distribution of chord lengths for five new plausible interpretations of randomness. This includes connecting (and extending) two random points within the circle to form a random chord, perhaps being a most natural interpretation of random.

[1] Aristoff J., Delmore S., Hernandez D., Kao S., Leu T., Lin H., Ramiscal J.A., Zackas R., Bertrand’s Paradox, a web-based Animation, http://web.mit.edu/tee/www/bertrand/problem.html [2] Bertrand J. (1888), Calcul des probabilities; Paris, 1888. [3] Chiu S. (2008); What is Randomness? in Probabilistic Analysis: Structuring, Processing and Presenting Probabilistic Information; Chapter 11, Class manuscript, Stanford University 2002 and revised September. [4] Crofton M.W.(1885), Probability; Encyclopedia Britannica 19; 9th edition, 768-788. [5] Kendall M.G., MORAN P.A.P. (1963), Geometrical Probability; Charles Griffen; London

[6] Holbrook J., KIM S.S. (2000), Bertrand’s Paradox Revisited; Math Intelligencer 22; 16-19. [7] Jaynes E.T. (1973), The Well-Posed Problem; Found. Phys 3; 477-492. [8] Larson R.C., Odonia A.R. (1981), Urban Operations Research; Prentice Hall, NJ, Sec. 3.3.2.; Book available on the web at http://web.mit.edu/urban_or_book/www/book/. [9] Marinoff L. (1994), A Resolution of Bertrand’s Paradox; Philos. Sci. 61; 1-24. [10] Rosenberg E. (2004), The Expected Length of a Random Line Segment in a Rectangle; Operations Research Letters 32; 99-102. [11] Streit F. (1978), On a Statistical Approach to Bertrand’s Problem; Elem. Math. 33; 134-138. [12] Tissler P.E. (1984), Bertrand's Paradox; The Mathematical Gazette (The Mathematical Association) 68(443); 15-19.