Evaluating and prioritizing the failure factors and cause of delays in IT projects using FMEA: Towards project continuity

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Today, the use of information technology and software applications in organizations is inevitable. To maintain competitiveness, companies need to define different projects in IT areas and also need to keep the risk level of the defined projects at an acceptable level. In this paper, it has been tried to develop a framework for assessing the readiness of IT projects by using the relationship between concepts of business continuity management and project management. Therefore, by reviewing the literature on causes of delays and failure factors in IT projects, as well as interviews with some experts and business continuity consultants, essential criteria for delaying and failing IT projects are selected, and the impact of these criteria on each of the five phases of IT project development are checked and prioritized. By presenting the extended formula to calculate the weighted risk priority number according to the Failure mode and effect analysis approach, a framework has been provided for assessing readiness based on the priority level of these criteria.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abdi, F., Amiri, A., & Farughi, H. (2018). Project scheduling with simultaneous optimization, time, net present value, and project flexibility for multimode activities with constrained renewable resources. International Journal of Engineering31(5), 780-791.
 
Alami, A. (2016). Why do information technology projects fail. Procedia Computer Science100(2016), 62-71.
 
Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2007). Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature. Information & Management44(6), 547-567.
 
Anandarajan, A., & Wen, H. J. (1999). Evaluation of information technology investment. Management decision.
 
Baba, H., Watanabe, T., Nagaishi, M., & Matsumoto, H. (2014). Area business continuity management, a new opportunity for building economic resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance18(296303), 00943-5.
 
Bahli, B., & Rivard, S. (2005). Validating measures of information technology outsourcing risk factors. Omega33(2), 175-187.
 
Bayat, H., Farnood Ahmadi, P., & Ardeshir, A. (2018). A Prioritization Model for HSE Risk Assessment Using Combined Failure Mode, Effect Analysis, and Fuzzy Inference System: A Case Study in Iranian Construction Industry. International Journal of Engineering31(9), 1487-1497.
 
Crawford, L., Pollack, J., & England, D. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. International journal of project management24(2), 175-184.
 
Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International journal of project management21(2), 89-95.
 
 
Jafari, M., Rezaeenour, J., Mazdeh, M. M., & Hooshmandi, A. (2011). Development and evaluation of a knowledge risk management model for project‐based organizations. Management Decision.
 
Jugdev, K., & Moller, R. (2006). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. IEEE Engineering Management Review34(3), 110-110.
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
 
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology28(4), 563-575.
 
Liu, S., & Wang, L. (2014). Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: The role of strategic importance. International Journal of Project Management32(8), 1494-1510.
 
Liu, S., & Deng, Z. (2015). How environment risks moderate the effect of control on performance in information technology projects: Perspectives of project managers and user liaisons. International Journal of Information Management35(1), 80-97.
 
Marchewka, J. T. (2016). Information technology project management: Providing measurable organizational value. John Wiley & Sons.
Milosevic, D., & Patanakul, P. (2005). Standardized project management may increase development projects success. International journal of project management23(3), 181-192.
 
Montequin, V. R., Cousillas, S., Ortega, F., & Villanueva, J. (2014). Analysis of the success factors and failure causes in Information & Communication Technology (ICT) projects in Spain. Procedia Technology16, 992-999.
 
Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International journal of project management14(2), 81-87.
 
Murray, A. (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2.
 
Niemimaa, M. (2017). Information systems continuity process: Conceptual foundations for the study of the “social”. Computers & Security65, 1-13.
Nuijten, A., Keil, M., Van der Pijl, G., & Commandeur, H. (2018). IT managers’ vs. IT auditors’ perceptions of risks: an actor–observer asymmetry perspective. Information & Management55(1), 80-93.
 
Papke-Shields, K. E., Beise, C., & Quan, J. (2010). Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?. International journal of project management28(7), 650-662.
 
PMBOK Guide sixth edition. (2017), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Inc.
Ramos, P., & Mota, C. (2014). Perceptions of success and failure factors in information technology projects: a study from Brazilian companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences119, 349-357.
 
Rani, S. B. A. S. U. (2017). A detailed study of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) models. International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science6(7).
 
Rodriguez-Segura, E., Ortiz-Marcos, I., Romero, J. J., & Tafur-Segura, J. (2016). Critical success factors in large projects in the aerospace and defense sectors. Journal of Business Research69(11), 5419-5425.
 
Savolainen, P., Ahonen, J. J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Software development project success and failure from the supplier's perspective: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management30(4), 458-469.
 
Standish Group, 1994. Chaos Report. (1994). disponível através da URL http://www. standishgroup. com/sample_research/chaos_1994_1. php, acessado pela última vez em, 14(10), p.2004.
 
Tan, F. T. C., Tan, B., Wang, W., & Sedera, D. (2017). IT-enabled operational agility: An interdependencies perspective. Information & Management54(3), 292-303.
 
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Toloie-Eshlaghy, A. (2018). A New Multi-objective Model for Multi-mode Project Planning with Risk. International Journal of Engineering31(5), 770-779.
 
Xiao, N., Huang, H. Z., Li, Y., He, L., & Jin, T. (2011). Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Engineering Failure Analysis18(4), 1162-1170.