The construction projects HSE performance evaluation considering the effect of external factors using Choquet integral, case study (an Iranian power plant construction company)

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of Industrial engineering, Tarbiat Modares University

2 CIPCE, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Tehran University Tehran, Iran


Nowadays, industrialization exposes the human and environment resources to serious dangers. The importance of these resources caused the HSE (health, safety and environment) to have a significant contribution in industries’ evaluation, especially in construction industry. While evaluating the project’s success from an HSE point of view, it is not enough to rely solely on the outputs without considering the impact of external factors affecting them. On the other hand, the variety of factors affecting HSE and their different kinds of interactions, forces us to use another aggregation operators rather than linear ones. Choquet integral (CI) is a well-known powerful aggregation operator to be used in such cases. There are different methods to define the coefficients of CI. One of the most recent and prominent methods is “the most representative capacity definition method”. This paper proposes a modification to this method by improving its entropy and consequently the reliability in, as named, non-reference projects evaluation. The modified algorithm is used in evaluating the impact of external factors on HSE performance of power plant construction projects. The results show the prominence of modified algorithm’s entropy compared to the original algorithm. Ultimately the external factors integrated score, which resembles the suitability of project’s environment, is compared with the score defined considering output results. According to results, in some projects there is a deep gap between score of HSE output result and aggregated score of external factors. The gap of two scores potentially figures the internal organizational factors performance.


Abdelhamid, T. S, & Everett, J.G. (2000). Identifying root causes of construction accidents. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management,126(1), 52-60.
Aksorn,T., & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2008). Critical success factors influencing safety program
performance in Thai construction projects. Safety Science, 46(4), 709-727..
Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2009). Non-additive robust ordinal regression with Choquet
integral, bipolar and level dependent Choquet integrals.
Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). The most representative utility function for non-additive
robust ordinal regression. In Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design (pp. 220-
229). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple
criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral.European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1),
Ashayeri, J., Tuzkaya, G., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2012). Supply chain partners and configuration selection:
An intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator based approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3),
Beliakov, G. (2008, January). Fitting fuzzy measures by linear programming. Programming library
fmtools. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems: proceedings: FUZZ-IEEE 2008 (pp.
862-867). IEEE.
Beliakov, G. (2009). Construction of aggregation functions from data using linear programming. Fuzzy
Sets and Systems, 160(1), 65-75.
Beliakov V, G. R. F. H. W. D. E. A. G. A. H. (2007). FMtools package (Version 1.0).
Cheng, E. W., Ryan, N., & Kelly, S. (2012). Exploring the perceived influence of safety management
practices on project performance in the construction industry. Safety science, 50(2), 363-369.
Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. In Annales de l’institut Fourier (Vol. 5, No. 131-295, pp. 85-
Choudhry, R. M., & Fang, D. (2008). Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating
factors on construction sites. Safety science, 46(4), 566-584.
Demirel, T., Demirel, N. Ç., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using
Choquet integral. Expert Systems with Applications,37(5), 3943-3952.
El-Mashaleh, M. S., Rababeh, S. M., & Hyari, K. H. (2010).Utilizing data envelopment analysis to
benchmark safety performance of construction contractors. International Journal of Project
Management, 28(1), 61-67.
Feng, Y. (2013). Effect of safety investments on safety performance of building projects. Safety
science, 59, 28-45.
Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2009). Building a set of additive value functions representing a
reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. European Journal of Operational
Research, 195(2), 460-486.
Gomes, L. F. A. M., Rangel, L. A. D., & Maranhão, F. J. C. (2009). Multicriteria analysis of natural gas
destination in Brazil: An application of the TODIM method. Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, 50(1), 92-100.
Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European
journal of operational research, 89(3), 445-456.
Grabisch, M. (1997). K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy sets and
systems, 92(2), 167-189.
Grabisch, M. (2009). Aggregation functions, Cambridge University Press.
Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., & Meyer, P. (2008). A review of methods for capacity identification in
Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package. European
journal of operational research, 186(2), 766-785.
Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2010). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in
multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research, 175(1), 247-286.
Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking
using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 416-436.
Gürbüz, T., & Albayrak, Y. E. (2014). An engineering approach to human resources performance
evaluation: Hybrid MCDM application with interactions.Applied Soft Computing, 21, 365-375.
Havrda, J., & Charvát, F. (1967). Quantification method of classification processes. Concept of structural
$ a $-entropy. Kybernetika, 3(1), 30-35.
Hinze, J., Thurman, S., & Wehle, A. (2013). Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety
science, 51(1), 23-28.
Kojadinovic, I. (2007). Minimum variance capacity identification. European Journal of Operational
Research, 177(1), 498-514.
Kojadinovic, I., Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2005). An axiomatic approach to the definition of the
entropy of a discrete Choquet capacity. Information Sciences, 172(1), 131-153.
Koutsikouri, D., Austin, S., & Dainty, A. (2008). Critical success factors in collaborative multidisciplinary
design projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6(3), 198-226.
Kuo, Y. C., Lu, S. T., Tzeng, G. H., Lin, Y. C., & Huang, Y. S. (2013). Using fuzzy integral approach to
enhance site selection assessment–a case study of the optoelectronics industry. Procedia Computer
Science, 17, 306-313.
Labreuche, C. (2008, June). Identification of a fuzzy measure with an L1 entropy. In Proceedings of
IPMU (Vol. 8, p. 1477).
Labreuche, C. (2009, July). On the Completion Mechanism Produced by the Choquet Integral on Some
Decision Strategies. In IFSA/EUSFLAT Conf. (pp. 567-572).
Li, G., Law, R., Vu, H. Q., & Rong, J. (2013). Discovering the hotel selection preferences of Hong Kong
inbound travelers using the Choquet Integral.Tourism Management, 36, 321-330.
Lim, C. S., & Mohamed, M. Z. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory reexamination.
International journal of project management, 17(4), 243-248.
Marichal, J. L. (2000). Behavioral analysis of aggregation in multicriteria decision aid. In Preferences and
decisions under incomplete knowledge (pp. 153-178). Physica-Verlag HD.
Marichal, J. L. (2002). Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities. European Journal of Operational
Research, 137(3), 612-624.
Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference
set. European journal of operational Research, 124(3), 641-650.
Murofushi, T. (1992, October). A technique for reading fuzzy measures (I): the Shapley value with respect
to a fuzzy measure. In 2nd Fuzzy Workshop (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39-48).
Murofushi, T., & Soneda, S. (1993, May). Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): interaction index.
In 9th fuzzy system symposium (pp. 693-696).
Pasrija, V., Kumar, S., & Srivastava, P. R. (2012). Assessment of Software Quality: Choquet Integral
Approach. Procedia Technology, 6, 153-162.
Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., & Fong, D. (1999). Factors affecting safety performance on construction
sites. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 309-315.
Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for nperson games In: KUHN, H. W. & TUCHER, A. W. (eds.)
Contribution to the theory of games II. Princeton: Pricton University Press
Ng, S. T., Cheng, K. P., & Skitmore, R. M. (2005). A framework for evaluating the safety performance of
construction contractors. Building and Environment,40(10), 1347-1355.
Toole, T. M. (2002). Construction site safety roles. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, 128(3), 203-210.
Wu, Y., Geng, S., Zhang, H., & Gao, M. (2014). Decision framework of solar thermal power plant site
selection based on linguistic Choquet operator. Applied Energy, 136, 303-311.
Zhou, Q., Fang, D., & Wang, X. (2008). A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human
safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Safety Science, 46(10), 1406-1419.