Competition of risk-averse and risk-neutral financial chains under government policy-making

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 College of Industrial Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 ICT Research Institute, Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This research analyzes the competition of two risk-neutral and risk-averse centralized financial chains (FCs) while the government regulates the market to prevent the disproportionately costly interest rates by eliminating unreasonable arbitration of transactions. Each FC consists of an investor and a broker, helping to fund the financial needs of the capital-constrained firms. Utilizing the Stackelberg game theory method, we formulate two-level and three-level optimization models for four potential scenarios and create an integrative structure for evaluating scenarios through the perspectives of both FCs’ risk orientations (i.e. risk-neutral and risk-averse) and two policies of the government (i.e., deregulation and regulation to mitigate the effect of arbitration). We found that under the government’s regulation policy, risk-averse FCs cause a lower amount of arbitration than risk-neutral FCs. We also realized that the increased volume of risk-free interest rate results in less arbitration. Results also demonstrate that the regulator can organize the competing FCs in the market by enforcing limits on interest rate and restricting costly interest rates by controlling the impacts of arbitration, which ensures a steady economy and encourages the funding of capital-constrained businesses.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ajello, A. (2012), “Financial Intermediation, Investment Dynamics and Business Cycle Fluctuations”, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1822592.
Ang, J.B. (2008), “What are the mechanisms linking financial development and economic growth in Malaysia?”, Economic Modelling, Elsevier, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 38–53.
Arasteh, A. (2016), “Combination of real options and game-theoretic approach in investment analysis”, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 361–375.
Carfí, D. and Musolino, F. (2014), “Speculative and hedging interaction model in oil and U . S . dollar markets with fi nancial transaction taxes”, Economic Modelling, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 37, pp. 306–319.
Carfì, D. and Musolino, F. (2012), “Game theory and speculation on government bonds”, Economic Modelling, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 2417–2426.
Chen, W., Zhang, Z.G. and Hua, Z. (2015), “Analysis of two-tier public service systems under a government subsidy policy”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 90, pp. 146–157.
Cheng, Z. (2016), “Small and medium-sized enterprises closed-loop supply chain finance risk based on evolutionary game theory and system dynamics”, Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 355–364.
Chitsaz, E., Liang, D. and Khoshsoroor, S. (2017), “The impact of resource configuration on Iranian technology venture performance”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 122, pp. 186–195.
Chu, T., Chang, Y., Zhou, W., Zhou, J. and Huang, M. (2018), “Bifurcation, intermittent chaos and multi-stability in a two-stage Cournot game with R&D spillover and product differentiation”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 341, pp. 358–378.
Chiu, C.-H. and Choi, T.-M. (2013), “Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: a technical review”, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 240 No. 2, pp. 489–507.
Cooray, A. (2011), “The role of the government in financial sector development”, Economic Modelling, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 928–938.
Dehghani Sadrabadi, M. H., Ghousi, R., & Makui,  ahmad. (2019). An enhanced robust possibilistic programming approach for forward distribution network design with the aim of establishing social justice: A real-world application. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 12(4), 76–106. http://www.jise.ir/article_103582.html
Gao, G.X., Fan, Z.P., Fang, X. and Lim, Y.F. (2018), “Optimal Stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending”, European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 267 No. 2, pp. 585–597.
Hafezalkotob, A. (2015), “Competition of two green and regular supply chains under environmental protection and revenue seeking policies of government”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 82, pp. 103–114.
Hafezalkotob, A. (2017), “Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, Vol. 97, pp. 228–250.
Hafezalkotob, A., Mahmoudi, R., Hajisami, E. and Wee, H.M. (2018), “Wholesale-retail pricing strategies under market risk and uncertain demand in supply chain using evolutionary game theory”, Kybernetes, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 1178–1201.
Hoffmann, A. and Schnabl, G. (2016), “Monetary policies of industrial countries, emerging market credit cycles and feedback effects”, Journal of Policy Modeling, The Society for Policy Modeling, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 855–873.
Lam, M.C.H. (2002), “Herd behaviour and interest rate defense”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 181–193.
Li, Y. and Wang, W. (2020), “Optimal Financing Models Offered by Manufacturers with Risk Aversion and”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 00 No. 00, pp. 1–44.
Masood, O. and Sergi, B.S. (2011), “China’s banking system, market structure, and competitive conditions”, Frontiers of Economics in China, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 22–35.
Malekmohammadi, H., & Makui, A. (2019). A multi-objective robust optimization model to design a network for Emergency Medical Services under uncertainty conditions: A case study. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 12(3), 210–225. http://www.jise.ir/article_96728.html
Morellec, E. and Schürhoff, N. (2011), “Corporate investment and financing under asymmetric information”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 99 No. 2, pp. 262–288.
Musolino, F. (2012), “Game theory for speculative derivatives: A possible stabilizing regulatory model”, AAPP Atti Della Accademia Peloritana Dei Pericolanti, Vol. 90 No. SUPPL.1PART1.
Della Posta, P. (2016), “Currency and external debt crises: A unifying framework”, Journal of Policy Modeling, The Society for Policy Modeling, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 723–736.
Qiao, K. (2013), “Government policies and corporate financing decisions in China: Theory and evidence”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 93–111.
Reza-Gharehbagh, R., Hafezalkotob, A., Asian, S., Makui, A., Allan, N.Z., (2019a). "Peer-to-peer financing choice of SME entrepreneurs in the re-emergence of supply chain localization". Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 0, 1–25.
Reza-Gharehbagh, R., Hafezalkotob, A., Makui, A., & Sayadi, M. K. (2019b). "Government intervention policies in competition of fi nancial chains : a game theory approach. Kybernetes.
Sheu, J.-B. (2011), “Bargaining framework for competitive green supply chains under governmental financial intervention”, Trnasportation Research Part E, Vol. 47, pp. 573–592.
Sokol, M. (2017), “Financialisation, financial chains and uneven geographical development: Towards a research agenda”, Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 39, pp. 678–685.
Woodford, M. (2010), “Financial Intermediation and Macroeconomic Analysis”, Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 21–44.
Xiao, L., Wang, X., Chin, K.S. and Qin, Y. (2017), “Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidy”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 417–432.
Xiao, T. and Yang, D. (2008), “Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty”, Int. J. Production Economics, pp. 187–200.
Zhao, L. and Huchzermeier, A. (2015), “Operations-finance interface models: A literature review and framework”, European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier Ltd., Vol. 244 No. 3, pp. 905–917.
Zutshi, A., Mota, D., Grilo, A. and Faias, M. (2018), “A game theory approach to online lead generation for oligopoly markets”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Elsevier, Vol. 121 No. May 2017, pp. 131–138.